Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1002 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Minecraft than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 801 vs 654 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
801
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€142.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €142.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11859 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |