Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 932 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 17% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 42 vs 36 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |