Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i7-4712MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1163 days newer than Core i7-4712MQ.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-4712MQ - 111 vs 106 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 37 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-4712MQ
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-4712MQ |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 14th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 37 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
