Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2227 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1620 - 167 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
