Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3735 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8300 - 148 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - €80.56 vs €188.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 7600 - €0.63 vs €1.28 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
49.21875%
Price, €
€188.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33802 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
85.8108108108108%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33791 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |