Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Ryzen 5 4600H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1094 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Ryzen 5 4600H - 226 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600H - 32 vs 12 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€377.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €377.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |