Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600H is 2681 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Performs up to 43% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3240 - 357 vs 249 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 5 4600H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Renoir | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
