Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600H is 1946 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 130 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 45 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 5 4600H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Renoir | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
