Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €92.12 vs €161.92
- Up to 30% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-14100F - €0.16 vs €0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 3600 - 700 vs 582 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
582
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€92.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €92.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10797 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
700
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
69%
Price, €
€161.92
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €161.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |