Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 912 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €78.8 vs €92.12
- Up to 15% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 3600 - €0.28 vs €0.33 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €92.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12230 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |