Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 104 days newer than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 3400G - 179 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
169
94.41340782122904%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54527 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
71.57360406091371%
Multi-Core
3619
38.61914416817842%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Picasso | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |