Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2448 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 33% better in F1 23 than FX-8350 - 199 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than FX-8350 - €105.57 vs €285.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-8350 - €0.53 vs €1.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €105.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15718 minutes ago
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15717 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |