Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2573 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Xeon E3-1260L - 272 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1260L |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 45 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |