Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4195 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 44% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1260L - 130 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€278
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €278 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |