Buy on Amazon
€261.39
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1368 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G3250 - 128 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €39.9 vs €261.39
- Up to 83% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.34 vs €2.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.04/FPS
16%
Price, €
€261.39
15%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, Processore 6 - Core 19 MB, Cache 95 W, Wraith spire Cooler, Nero
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9347 minutes ago
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
117
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel LGA1150 Processore Pentium G3250 da 3.2GHz, 54W, Grigio
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9346 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
