Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €208.1 vs €422.66
- Up to 49% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-9700F - €1.02 vs €1.99 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 2600X - 212 vs 204 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
204
96.22641509433963%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €208.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
51.256281407035175%
Price, €
€422.66
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €422.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
79.85797288573274%
Multi-Core
5263
84.1272378516624%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |