Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1585 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 2500X - 200 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€685
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €685 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
35.52334943639291%
Multi-Core
3801
17.40942609810837%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |