Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1227 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 35% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1820 - 325 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
325
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |