Buy on Amazon
€70.12
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1631 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6300 - 173 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €38.99 vs €70.12
- Up to 39% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 1600 - €0.25 vs €0.41 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD CPU RYZEN 5 1600 AM4
Buy for €70.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
CPU AMD FX-6300, Socket AM3+, 4 core, 6MB di cache, 3.3GHz, 32nm, 95W TDP
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
