Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1758 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-6600K - 171 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - €188.88 vs €261.39
- Up to 26% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 3 3300X - €1.13 vs €1.53 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
73%
Price, €
€261.39
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13040 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
167
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |