Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 460 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 18% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen 3 3250U - 116 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 24 vs 4 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
