Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 5052 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 80% better in Starfield than Phenom X4 9550 - 72 vs 40 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
72
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |