Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1712 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Phenom X4 9550 - 251 vs 245 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 55 vs 95 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
251
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
