Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1665 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 6 than Phenom II X4 925 - 92 vs 87 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
87
94.56521739130434%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |