Buy on Amazon
€7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 781 days newer than the more expensive FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4100 - 117 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than FX-4100 - €7.0 vs €22.88
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron G1820 2.70 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 53 W CPU Processore LGA 1150
Buy for €7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92772 minutes ago
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76884 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
