Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4712 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 39% better in Rust than Phenom II X4 810 - 204 vs 147 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |