Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 812 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-9590 - 172 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than FX-9590 - €61.88 vs €163.64
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 51 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €163.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Buy for €61.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |