Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-9590 is 1251 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-650 - 226 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 11% cheaper than FX-9590 - €148.8 vs €166.86
- Up to 9% better value when playing Lost Ark than FX-9590 - €0.67 vs €0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 73 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €166.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for €148.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |