Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2681 days newer than FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 26% better in Dota 2 than FX-8370 - 212 vs 168 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for €70.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 576 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |