Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €285.0 vs €583.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900F - €1.88 vs €2.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 37% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8350 - 208 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Buy for €583 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |