Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1316 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-8350 - 231 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than FX-8350 - €188.88 vs €285.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than FX-8350 - €0.82 vs €1.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14545 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14546 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |