Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8320E vs Core i7-6900K

FX-8320E vs Core i7-6900K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 637 days newer than FX-8320E.

Advantages of AMD FX-8320E

  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K

  • Performs up to 31% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320E - 115 vs 88 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales.
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales

Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


FPS

88

76%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i7-6900K Logo
Core i7-6900K

Desktop • May 31st, 2016


FPS

115

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.64/FPS

100%

Price, €

€188.88

100%

FPS and Value Winner

INTEL Core i7-6900K 3,20 gHz LGA2011-V3 20MB Cache

Buy for 188.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 24 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014

Intel Core i7-6900K Logo
Core i7-6900K

Desktop • May 31st, 2016

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

443

35%

Multi-Core

1680

23%

Intel Core i7-6900K Logo
Core i7-6900K

Desktop • May 31st, 2016


Single-Core

1252

100%

Multi-Core

7118

100%

AMD FX-8320E Logo

AMD FX-8320E

vs
Intel Core i7-6900K Logo

Intel Core i7-6900K

Sep 2nd, 2014Release Date
May 31st, 2016
FXCollectionCore i7
VisheraCodenameBroadwell-E
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 2011-3
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores8
8Threads
16
3.2 GHzBase Clock Speed3.2 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed3.7 GHz
95 W
TDP140 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
32.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
YesOverclockableYes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.