Buy on Amazon
€146.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $134
Availability
MSRP in USD: $134
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3046 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320E - 131 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel® Core™ i3-13100, processore desktop, per sistemi 4 core (4 P-core + 0 E-core) Cache 12 MB, fino a 4,5 GHz
Buy for €146.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i3-13100
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
