Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2645 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-8150 - 242 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
242
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11277 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |