Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 is 326 days older than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1014 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
83.33333333333334%
Multi-Core
606
38.64795918367347%
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |