Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2558 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6350 - 188 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |