Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €49.68 vs €537.87
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than FX-6300 - 231 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for €537.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |