Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €49.68 vs €422.66
- Up to 86% better value when playing New World than Core i7-9700F - €0.51 vs €3.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 20% better in New World than FX-6300 - 118 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
98
83.05084745762711%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.58/FPS
14.24581005586592%
Price, €
€422.66
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €422.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |