Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - €49.68 vs €152.69
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-6300 - 153 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 320 minutes ago
Buy for €152.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 320 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |