Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 902 days newer than Core i7-860.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Lynnfield |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
