Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4590S outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4590S is 794 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590S - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590S
- Performs up to 11% better in Lost Ark than FX-6200 - 245 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i5-4590S
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590S |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
