Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 138 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 0% better in Rocket League than FX-6100 - 671 vs 670 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
| 6 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
