Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - €24.38 vs €212.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-13400 - €0.19 vs €0.89 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 82% better in War Thunder than FX-4300 - 237 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
130
54.85232067510548%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2106 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
21.34831460674157%
Price, €
€212
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €212 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |