Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 229 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than FX-4300 - 254 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
