Key Differences
In short — FX-4130 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4130 is 320 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than FX-4100 - 233 vs 232 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74704 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |