Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1693 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - €22.88 vs €188.88
- Up to 87% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-6900K - €0.09 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than FX-4100 - 272 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
13%
Price, €
€188.88
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |