Buy on Amazon
€22.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $313
Availability
MSRP in USD: $313
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - €22.88 vs €203.76
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-4100 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75757 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3770K Processore (3,5GHz, L3 Cache, Sockel 1155)
Buy for €203.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
