Buy on Amazon
€22.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - €22.88 vs €239.68
- Up to 90% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-3450 - €0.23 vs €2.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 3% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-4100 - 101 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-3450 Processore
Buy for €239.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
