Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €22.88 vs €163.5
- Up to 86% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-11600 - €0.03 vs €0.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than FX-4100 - 755 vs 671 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4006 minutes ago
Buy for €163.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4007 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |