Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2364 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - €22.88 vs €62.97
- Up to 62% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-8100T - €0.11 vs €0.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-4100 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Buy for €62.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |